News by Month
Please reload

New Article: Computer-aided Detection in Malpractice Litigation as Published in MD News, Long Island, May 6, 2016

May 5, 2016

 

By: Thomas A. Mobilia, JD, and Daniel L. Freidlin, JD
Friday, May 06, 2016
 

Defending the radiologist in a medical malpractice case poses unique challenges. The plaintiff’s attorney has the benefit of later-stage imaging and the patient’s presumably bad outcome, both of which will be used to persuade a jury that some abnormality on earlier imaging scans conducted on the same location was missed.

 

 

For example, defendant radiologists often face the allegation of failing to detect a malignancy on a screening mammogram. To prevail against such a claim, the physician who interpreted the diagnostic study must be able to demonstrate that the imaging was appropriately evaluated and the finding in question was not present at the time — or, that it was so subtle it could only be appreciated with the benefit of hindsight.

 

The successful defense of a failure to diagnose breast cancer case begins with a well-documented radiology report, including conforming to the BI-RADS reporting system recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR).The breast imager may also benefit from documenting the use of computer-aided detection (CAD).

 

Click Here to read the full article

Please reload

  • Facebook App Icon
  • LinkedIn App Icon
 Contact Us  | Legal Disclaimer

 

©2017  Martin Clearwater & Bell LLP. All Rights Reserved.

 

(212) 697-3122 | info@mcblaw.com